-
周波:过度自信的美国很危险,缺乏自信的美国更危险
最后更新: 2020-07-29 14:28:20Why China must beware a less confident US, politically divided and pessimistic about its future
Has China’s foreign policy restraint ended? This is the question raised by Kurt M. Campbell and Mira Rapp-Hooper in their essay “China is done biding its time” in Foreign Affairs. They argue that since the pandemic first engulfed the world, China’s government has engaged in an unprecedented diplomatic offensive, taking advantage of the ensuing chaos and the global power vacuum left by a no-show US administration.
Likewise, in a recent opinion piece in the Financial Times, Michele Flournoy, a former US undersecretary of defence for policy, concludes that China’s border clash with India is another sign of the county’s growing assertiveness.
Such views, preponderant in Western media, need serious examination. China’s “assertiveness”, be it in the South China Sea or the Galwan Valley, is a response to the challenges it perceives to its sovereignty. And China doesn’t need to make use of the “chance” provided by the pandemic since China is stronger than these countries militarily.
In Hong Kong, where the “one country, two system” framework applies, “one country” comes first, and “two systems” doesn’t mean the central government should tolerate the unrest that has plagued the city in recent years. The national security law is an “enough is enough” response.
While it is debatable whether the US has declined in power, most people agree at least that the US has declined relative to other nations, such as the new emerging economies. But Donald Trump is the biggest proponent of the “decline” narrative. His sketch of “American carnage” and then championing of “America first” helped him win the presidential election in 2016.
Democrat presidential hopeful Joe Biden and former national security adviser John Bolton called Trump “an aberration”, but he surely isn’t one if he is re-elected in November. This president, who engaged in aberrant behaviour on a daily basis, would then look more like the culmination of long-standing trends in a country that is politically divided and broadly pessimistic about its future.
Even if the US is in retreat, Beijing has more serious business to attend to than confront Washington, most importantly the “great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation” by 2049. Thus, even if the Chinese government decided against setting a gross domestic product target for 2020 due to the pandemic, it hasn’t relented on its commitment to eliminate extreme poverty by the end of this year.
It is particularly ludicrous to hear Washington describe Beijing as “assertive” or “coercive”. In a telephone conversation with Trump in 2019, former US president Jimmy Carter referred to the US as “the most warlike nation in the history of the world” and said the US has been at peace for only 16 of its 242 years as a nation. Professor Michael Lind pointed out in The National Interest in 2019 that “the US is now engaged in more simultaneous small wars on more fronts than at any point in its history”.
In comparison, China has had no wars since 1979. The deadly brawl in the Galwan Valley is most unfortunate; still, soldiers from both sides had a tacit understanding of not shooting at each other.
American policies towards China have been based on narcissism (“We rebuilt China over the last 25 years”, remarked US Vice-President Michael Pence) and hallucination (the US Strategic Approach to China noted that China’s “rapid economic development and engagement with the world did not lead to convergence with the citizen-centric, free and open order as the United States had hoped”).
Beijing should never have misled Washington in this regard – stability in its political system and society has always been China’s core interest.
An overconfident US after the Cold War has proved dangerous. The US’ war in Afghanistan alone killed tens of thousands of people, including more than 2,300 American troops. But a less confident US is probably more dangerous. Washington has finally dropped its mask and is making all its resources available to maintain its primacy and suppress China.
This is clear in the US’ bills on Taiwan, its change of policy of not taking sides on the South China Sea issue and calls to allies and partners to band together with Washington against Beijing. The US’ efforts around the world against Chinese telecom company Huawei are not really because Huawei’s 5G network is a “Trojan horse” of Chinese intelligence services, as US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo asserted, but that if Huawei’s 5G system is widely adopted, the US might lose its supremacy in communication technology to China.
How could China continue to develop peacefully amid these headwinds? The Chinese government believes that while the world is experiencing profound changes “unprecedented in a century”, this is also the “best time for China’s development since modern times”. The most profound change the world is experiencing is China growing ever stronger.
In the Asia-Pacific, China’s neighbours fear being pushed to take sides by either China or the US. During an Asian tour in August last year, US Defence Secretary Mark T. Esper said the Pentagon would like to deploy intermediate-range American missiles in Asia within months. Some Association of South Asian Nations members might wish the US could balance China, but never at a cost of turning the South China Sea into a battlefield on their doorsteps.
Neither Beijing nor Washington wants a conflict. But should a conflict occur between them, it will occur in the Western Pacific, not in the waters off Hawaii or continental USA. The People’s Liberation Army thus at least enjoys the convenience of geography. There is no guarantee that the US military will prevail. War games conducted by Rand showed that the US could very well lose a war to China.
At the 74th session of the UN General Assembly last year, UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres warned against a “great fracture” – the world splitting in two with the two largest economies creating separate and competing worlds. Sadly, this looks more real than ever.
本文系观察者网独家稿件,文章内容纯属作者个人观点,不代表平台观点,未经授权,不得转载,否则将追究法律责任。关注观察者网微信guanchacn,每日阅读趣味文章。
标签-
本文仅代表作者个人观点。
- 责任编辑: 杨晗轶
-
1谁在阻碍中国人了解印度的饮食评论 83 赞 2
2拼低工资?我认识好几个造船厂的管理者,太了解造船了评论 80 赞 52
3粤语童谣纳入了人教版音乐课,让外省孩子们多学方言,这是文化自信的表现评论 57 赞 5
4胡塞武装势如破竹!美国力不从心,沙特危矣评论 39 赞 38
5张雪称儿子考60分就很好,并劝年轻人努力搬砖,如何看待他的观点?评论 32 赞 3
6中东战争给美国亚太盟友上了一堂地缘课评论 27 赞 5
7初中没上完的发小相信大明统治了全世界评论 27 赞 0
8暴雨夜,两个壮汉当街拖走一个18岁女孩,谁在给“卖女儿”开绿灯?评论 23 赞 22
9一次打坏12架战机!美空军基地遭伊朗导弹重击,伊朗导弹越打越准!评论 22 赞 19
10全世界把英语纳入基础教育的确实很普遍评论 19 赞 12最新闻 Hot-
“胡塞主动联系,希望美国‘不要介入’”
-
36年来首次!智利政府不举行阿连德纪念仪式
-
“瑞典民主党若首次入阁,将进一步呼应欧洲极右翼”
-
欧洲央行行长:当前通胀冲击将持续更长时间
-
“特朗普说给美国选民听的”
-
“小博索纳罗有份反华文件,背后藏着万斯的影子”
-
沙特关键输油管道遇袭,“预防性关闭”
-
乌方放风:正准备于10月恢复谈判,三方一起谈
-
法拉奇不到24小时吸金7200万英镑,“远超英国两大党”
-
“我乐见爱尔兰统一”,英国:???
-
俄罗斯警告:在切尔诺贝利禁区,乌军有大动作
-
离谱!特朗普:人类灭绝?我就担心中国…
-
“这是一次又一次的背叛”
-
911纪念仪式,穆斯林市长还是去了
-
“瑞典不得不服软,中国太硬”
-
日本前外相岩屋毅等将访华,“感谢中方接受”
-

观察员










上海市互联网违法与不良信息举报中心